Sumerlin #498164 v. Bien

Filing 24

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 23 ; granting motion for voluntary dismissal 19 and dismissing claims as to defendant Bien; dismissing as moot motion for summary judgment 12 ; granting plaintiff's motion to amend/correct complaint 23 ; Clerk shall accept the proposed document for filing; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ARTHUR SUMERLIN, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv-459 v. HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY BARBARA BIEN, Defendant. _______________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on March 9, 2018, recommending that this Court grant Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (ECF No. 19), and grant Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend/correct his complaint (ECF No. 16). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 23) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED. All claims against Defendant Bien are DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Bien’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 12) is DISMISSED as moot IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend/correct his complaint (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall accept the proposed document for filing. Dated: April 13, 2018 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?