Popp v. Lakeshore Foods Corp.

Filing 27

OPINION; Order to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)

See Moore v. Rohm & Haas Co

Helder v. Hitachi Power Tools, Ltd.

id.

see also Reese v. CNH Am. LLC

Moore v. Rohm & Haas Co.
Moses v. Bus. Card Exp., Inc.

Perceptron, Inc. v. Silicon Video, Inc.

see also

Steelcase, Inc. v. Smart Techs., Inc.

Smart Techs.
Id.

Factor 1 – Convenience of the Witnesses

e.g. Pilates Inc. v. Pilates Inst.

Fed. Elec. Prods. Co. v. Frank Adam Elec. Co.
key

See id.

see also Thomas v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.

id.
id

See AutoWares, LLC v. Wisconsin River Co-op Servs.

Steelcase, Inc. v. Mar-Mol Co., Inc.

Id.

Factor 2 – Location of Relevant Documents and Relative Ease of Access to Sources of Proof

Factor 3 – Convenience of the Parties

Hite v. Norwegian Caribbean Lines

Factor 4 – Locus of the Operative Facts

Factor 5 – Availability of Process to Compel Attendance of Unwilling Witnesses

See
Thomas

Factor 6 – Relative Means of the Parties

Factor 7 – Forum’s Familiarity with the Governing Law

Factor 8 – Weight Accorded the Plaintiff’s Choice of Forum

See e.g. Johnston v.
Foster-Wheeler Constructors, Inc.

Factor 9 – Trial Efficiency and Interests of Justice, based on the Totality of Circumstances

13

/s/ Janet T. Neff