Popp v. Lakeshore Foods Corp.

Filing 27

OPINION; Order to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)

Download PDF
See Moore v. Rohm & Haas Co Helder v. Hitachi Power Tools, Ltd. id. see also Reese v. CNH Am. LLC Moore v. Rohm & Haas Co. Moses v. Bus. Card Exp., Inc. Perceptron, Inc. v. Silicon Video, Inc. see also Steelcase, Inc. v. Smart Techs., Inc. Smart Techs. Id. Factor 1 – Convenience of the Witnesses e.g. Pilates Inc. v. Pilates Inst. Fed. Elec. Prods. Co. v. Frank Adam Elec. Co. key See id. see also Thomas v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. id. id See AutoWares, LLC v. Wisconsin River Co-op Servs. Steelcase, Inc. v. Mar-Mol Co., Inc. Id. Factor 2 – Location of Relevant Documents and Relative Ease of Access to Sources of Proof Factor 3 – Convenience of the Parties Hite v. Norwegian Caribbean Lines Factor 4 – Locus of the Operative Facts Factor 5 – Availability of Process to Compel Attendance of Unwilling Witnesses See Thomas Factor 6 – Relative Means of the Parties Factor 7 – Forum’s Familiarity with the Governing Law Factor 8 – Weight Accorded the Plaintiff’s Choice of Forum See e.g. Johnston v. Foster-Wheeler Constructors, Inc. Factor 9 – Trial Efficiency and Interests of Justice, based on the Totality of Circumstances 13 /s/ Janet T. Neff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?