Weese et al v. Kalamazoo Metro Transit
Filing
8
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 ; dismissing complaint and certifying that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith; Judgment to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DAN WEESE and CHERYL SULT-WEESE,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 1:17-cv-926
v.
HON. JANET T. NEFF
KALAMAZOO METRO TRANSIT,
Defendant.
____________________________/
ORDER
This is a civil action filed by pro se litigants. On October 27, 2017, the Magistrate Judge
issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that Plaintiffs’ complaint be dismissed with
prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and that an appeal of this
matter would not be taken in good faith. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on
Plaintiffs. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 6) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3)
that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth,
114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199,
206, 211-12 (2007).
A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.
Dated: November 17, 2017
/s/ Janet T. Neff
JANET T. NEFF
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?