Threatt #106218 v. Holmes et al
Filing
62
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 61 ; Defendants' motions for summary judgment 26 , 33 , 51 are granted; Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Smith and Stevens are dismissed without prejudice; this matter is terminated; the Court discerns no good-faith basis for appeal ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TOMMIE THREATT, #106218,
Plaintiff,
File no: 1:18-CV-96
v.
HON. ROBERT J. JONKER
SCOTT HOLMES, M.D., et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER APPROVING MAGISTRATE'S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States
Magistrate Judge in this action on (ECF No. 61). The Report and Recommendation was duly served
on the parties. No objections have been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 61) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos.
26, 33, 51) are GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Smith and Stevens are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is TERMINATED.
The Court discerns no good-faith basis for appeal of this matter.
See McGore v.
Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Date:
February 12, 2019
/s/ Robert J. Jonker
ROBERT J. JONKER
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?