Cain #490544 v. Palmer et al

Filing 96

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 88 ; denying motion for summary judgment 23 ; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)

Download PDF
Case 1:19-cv-00628-JTN-SJB ECF No. 96 filed 09/09/20 PageID.428 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRANDON LEWIS CAIN, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:19-cv-628 v. HON. JANET T. NEFF CARMEN PALMER, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDER This is a prisoner civil rights action. Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the Basis of Exhaustion (ECF No. 23). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on August 14, 2020, recommending that this Court deny the motion, adopt the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law as to Defendants’ affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and conclude that the grievance process was unavailable to Plaintiff. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 88) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment on the Basis of Exhaustion (ECF No. 23) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court adopts the findings of fact and conclusions of law as set forth in the Report and Recommendation concerning Defendants’ affirmative defense Case 1:19-cv-00628-JTN-SJB ECF No. 96 filed 09/09/20 PageID.429 Page 2 of 2 of failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and concludes that the grievance process was unavailable to Plaintiff. Dated: September 9, 2020 /s/ Janet T. Neff JANET T. NEFF United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?