Hardy v. Johnston et al

Filing 11

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 10 ; certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith; Judgment to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GREGORY HARDY, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:20-cv-649 v. HON. JANET T. NEFF BILL JOHNSTON, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDER This is a civil action filed by a pro se litigant. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on August 25, 2020 (ECF No. 10), recommending that, except for Plaintiff’s MMWA claim, all of Plaintiff’s federal claims be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim; that Plaintiff’s MMWA claim be dismissed without prejudice; and that Plaintiff’s state-law claims be dismissed without prejudice. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 10) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, except for Plaintiff’s MMWA claim, all of Plaintiff’s federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim; that Plaintiff’s MMWA claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and that Plaintiff’s state-law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of the Judgment would not be taken in good faith. A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order. Dated: September 14, 2020 /s/ Janet T. Neff JANET T. NEFF United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?