Richardson v. Strickland

Filing 3

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1 ; the transfer of the Motorhome to the Church is avoided as a constructively fraudulent transfer; plaintiff's second motion for default judgment is granted; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (haw)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-00141-HYJ-PJG ECF No. 3, PageID.26 Filed 02/18/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: Bankruptcy Case No. 19-03599 DOVIE J. JOHNSON-LIPSEY Adversary Proceeding No. 20-80055 Debtor. _________________________________/ THOMAS C. RICHARDSON, Chapter 7 Trustee Plaintiff, Case No. 1:21-cv-141 Hon. Hala Y. Jarbou v. STRICJAVVAR FLOYD STRICKLAND, Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 1-1) filed by the United States Bankruptcy Judge in this action regarding the Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Default Judgment against the Defendant Stricjavvar Floyd Strickland. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objections have been filed under FED. R. BANKR. P. 9033 and LCivR 83.2(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation of the Bankruptcy Judge, filed January 22, 2021, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the Opinion of this Court. 2. The transfer of the Motorhome to the Church is AVOIDED as a constructively fraudulent transfer under 11 U.S.C. § 548. Case 1:21-cv-00141-HYJ-PJG ECF No. 3, PageID.27 Filed 02/18/21 Page 2 of 2 3. The Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED and judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff Trustee, authorizing Plaintiff to recover the Motorhome from the Defendant, plus costs in the amount of $350.00, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. Dated: February 18, 2021 /s/ Hala Y. Jarbou HALA Y. JARBOU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?