Hedlund #469691 v. Jones et al

Filing 47

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 46 ; granting motion for summary judgment on the basis of exhaustion 20 ; certifying that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith; Judgment to issue; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KEITH HEDLUND, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:22-cv-355 v. HON. JANE M. BECKERING UNKNOWN JONES, et al., Defendants. _________________________/ ORDER This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant John Harris (named as “Correctional Officer Harris”) is the only remaining defendant in this matter. Defendant Harris filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the Basis of Exhaustion (ECF No. 20). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 46) on January 9, 2024, recommending that this Court grant the motion. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the remaining parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 46) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment on the Basis of Exhaustion (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith because Plaintiff failed to file any objections. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007). A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order. Dated: February 6, 2024 /s/ Jane M. Beckering JANE M. BECKERING United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?