Martin #857172 v. Washington et al

Filing 6

(DISREGARD) OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (elam) Modified text on 3/6/2025 - disregard per chambers, wrong document attached(slk).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
______
ISAIAH ROBINSON,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 1:24-cv-1294
Honorable Robert J. Jonker

DANA M. NESSEL et al.,
Defendants.

____________________________/
ORDER
This action arises out of a pleading titled, “Common Law Writ Application in Admiralty
Venue,” which was filed by state prisoner Isaiah Robinson. Plaintiff sues Dana M. Nessel, Heidi
E. Washington, William Zeerip, Robert D. Springstead, Anthony A. Monton, H. Kevin Drake,
Scott D. Walburn, Robert M. Hayes, Robert Mendham, Daniel Evans, the State Bar of Michigan,
Newaygo County, and the City of White Cloud. In Plaintiff’s original pleading, he appeared to
seek release from incarceration and $100 million in damages. (ECF No. 1, PageID.51.) In an order
entered on December 10, 2024, the Court severed Plaintiff’s claim for damages against the abovelisted parties into the present action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 5, PageID.177.)
On January 31, 2025, the Court entered an order directing Plaintiff to file an amended
complaint on the form required by this Court under Local Civil Rule 5.6(a) to correct several
deficiencies in the original complaint. (ECF No. 8.) The Court allowed 21 days for Plaintiff to
comply. (Id., PageID.182.) The Court warned Plaintiff that if he failed to comply, the Court would
dismiss his complaint for failure to comply with the Court’s order and for lack of prosecution. (Id.,
PageID.183 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)).)

More than 21 days have elapsed, and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint.
Because Plaintiff has wholly failed to comply with the Court’s order, the Court will issue a
judgment dismissing the case without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with
the Court’s order. See In re Alea, 286 F.3d 378, 380–81 (6th Cir. 2002); McGore v. Wrigglesworth,
114 F.3d 601, 604 (6th Cir. 1997). Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF
No. 2) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

March 5, 2025

/s/ Robert J. Jonker
Robert J. Jonker
United States District Judge

2