Colvin #192744 v. Prison Health Services et al
Filing
79
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 76 , and granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment 46 and 57 , and dismissing this case in its entirety ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
KENNETH COLVIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 2:12-cv-347
HON. ROBERT HOLMES BELL
PRISON HEATH SERVICES, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On January 28, 2014, Magistrate Judge Timothy Greeley issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) (Dkt. No.76) recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary
judgment be granted. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. The
Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes
a sound recommendation.
For the foregoing reasons, this Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation as the Opinion of this Court. A Judgment will be entered consistent with this
Opinion and Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Because this action was filed in forma pauperis, this
Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal of this decision would not be taken
in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610 (6th Cir.1997). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s January 28, 2014, R&R (Dkt.
No.76) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is
GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good
faith.
Dated: February 21, 2014
/s/ Robert Holmes Bell
ROBERT HOLMES BELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?