Riddle #180984 et al v. Napel
Filing
106
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 102 re 100 : Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 100 is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; case closed; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
MARCEL RIDDLE,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:13-CV-152
v.
HON. GORDON J. QUIST
ROBERT NAPEL, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Timothy Greeley’s June 29, 2016 Report and
Recommendation, which recommends that the Court grant Defendant Napel’s motion for summary
judgment and dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety. The Report and Recommendation was
served on Plaintiff on June 29, 2016. On July 25, 2016, this Court issued an Order granting
Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file objections, granting Plaintiff until August 15, 2016
to file objections. The deadline has passed and Plaintiff has failed to file objections pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636. Accordingly, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge (ECF No. 102), filed June 29, 2016, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
100) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
This case is concluded.
Dated: August 24, 2016
/s/ Gordon J. Quist
GORDON J. QUIST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?