Riddle #180984 et al v. Napel

Filing 106

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 102 re 100 : Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 100 is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; case closed; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION MARCEL RIDDLE, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:13-CV-152 v. HON. GORDON J. QUIST ROBERT NAPEL, et al., Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Timothy Greeley’s June 29, 2016 Report and Recommendation, which recommends that the Court grant Defendant Napel’s motion for summary judgment and dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety. The Report and Recommendation was served on Plaintiff on June 29, 2016. On July 25, 2016, this Court issued an Order granting Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file objections, granting Plaintiff until August 15, 2016 to file objections. The deadline has passed and Plaintiff has failed to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Accordingly, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 102), filed June 29, 2016, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 100) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This case is concluded. Dated: August 24, 2016 /s/ Gordon J. Quist GORDON J. QUIST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?