Cross #150443 v. Cook et al
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [16 re 11 : Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 11 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Aston, MacLaren, Malette, and Olsen are DISMISSED; this case will continue against Defendant Cook; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
ALLOYSIUS CROSS,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:12-CV-318
v.
Hon. Gordon J. Quist
CHARLES COOK, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States
Magistrate Judge in this action on February 3, 2105, which was served on the parties that same day.
In that Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Greeley recommends that Defendants’
motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part. No objections have been filed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge filed February 3, 2105 (dkt. #16) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. # 11)
is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Aston,
MacLaren, Malette, and Olsen are DISMISSED with prejudice. The claims against Defendant
Cook shall proceed.
Dated: February 25, 2015
/s/ Gordon J. Quist
GORDON J. QUIST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?