Williams #541415 v. Yunker et al
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Western District of Michigan. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (SSch) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 9/16/2015.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
ROOSEVELT LASHAWN WILLIAMS,
Case No. 15-cv-13061
HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III
AARON YUNKER, et al.,
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
The matter before the Court is a pro se civil rights complaint. Plaintiff Roosevelt
Lashawn Williams (“Williams”) is a state prisoner at the Marquette Branch Prison in
Marquette, Michigan. His complaint appears to challenge two prison disciplinary actions
that were taken against him.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), the proper venue for civil actions is the judicial
district where (1) any defendant resides if all the defendants are residents of the State in
which the district is located; (2) a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to
the claim occurred or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is
situated; or, if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought, (3) in any
judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction. Public
officials sued in their official capacities "reside" in the judicial district where they maintain
their official residence or perform their official duties. O'Neill v. Battisti, 472 F.2d 789, 791
(6th Cir. 1972). For the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice,
a district court may transfer a civil case to any district where it could have been brought.
28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a).
Exhibits to the complaint indicate that the events giving rise to Williams' claims
occurred at Marquette Branch Prison in Marquette, Michigan. And, according to Williams,
the defendants are employed by the Michigan Department of Corrections at Marquette
Branch Prison. Compl. 3, ECF No. 1. The City of Marquette is located in Marquette County,
which lies within the geographical confines of the Northern Division of the Western District
of Michigan. See 28 U.S.C. § 102(b)(2). The Court therefore concludes that the Western
District of Michigan is a proper venue and a more convenient forum for this action.
WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall transfer this
case to the Western District of Michigan pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), 1404(a), and
1406(a). The Court has not determined whether Williams may proceed without prepayment
of the fees and costs for this lawsuit.
s/Stephen J. Murphy, III
STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III
United States District Judge
Dated: September 14, 2015
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties
and/or counsel of record on September 14, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?