Lindsey #256676 v. Wertanen et al
Filing
65
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 64 re 60 : Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 60 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; case to continue on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment and assault and battery claims; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMES LINDSEY #256676,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:16-CV-30
v.
HON. GORDON J. QUIST
RICK WERTANEN, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On April 27, 2018, Magistrate Judge Greeley issued a Report and Recommendation
recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment with regard to
Plaintiff’s retaliation, abuse of process, and defamation, libel and slander claims and deny it with
regard to Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment and assault and battery claims.
The Report and
Recommendation was duly served on the parties on April 27, 2018. No objections have been filed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Therefore the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the April 27, 2018, Report and Recommendation (ECF
No. 64) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
60) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff’s retaliation, abuse of process,
and defamation, libel and slander claims are dismissed with prejudice. The case will continue on
Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment and assault and battery claims.
Dated: May 16, 2018
/s/ Gordon J. Quist
GORDON J. QUIST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?