Kanapathippillai v. Lynch et al

Filing 12

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 10 ; Petitioner's petition is DENIED; case closed; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION __________________________ KANAPATHIPPILLAI THAYAPARAN, Petitioner, v. Case No. 2:16-CV-197 JEFF SESSIONS, et al., HON. GORDON J. QUIST Respondents. ______________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On February 14, 2017, Magistrate Judge Timothy Greeley issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court deny Petitioner’s habeas petition on the basis that Petitioner failed to show that his removal is unlikely in the reasonably foreseeable future. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties by February 15, 2017. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).1 Therefore the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Greeley’s Report and Recommendation issued February 14, 2017 (ECF No. 10) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the Opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED. 1 The Court notes that the copy of the Report and Recommendation sent to Petitioner was returned on February 23, 2017, marked “Inmate Transferred.” Petitioner’s failure to update the Court with his current address is itself a separate ground for dismissal “for want of prosecution.” W.D. Mich. LCivR 41.1. A separate judgment will issue.2 This case is concluded. Dated: March 8, 2017 2 /s/ Gordon J. Quist GORDON J. QUIST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Jeff Sessions has been substituted for Loretta Lynch pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?