Jamerson #138940 v. Crommell et al

Filing 51

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 46 re 41 : Defendant Crommell's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; case closed; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID L. JAMERSON # 138940, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:16-CV-229 v. HON. GORDON J. QUIST JEFF CROMMELL, et al., Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On August 14, 2019, Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat issued a Report and Recommendation (R & R) recommending that the Court grant Defendant Crommell’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 41). As noted in the R & R, Plaintiff did not respond to Defendant Crommell’s motion and, therefore, failed to present evidence opposing it. On September 4, 2019, this Court entered an Order denying Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file objections to the R & R because the Court concluded that the time for Plaintiff to gather evidence in response to Defendant Crommell’s motion had long passed. (ECF No. 50.) The R & R was duly served on Plaintiff on August 15, 2019, and Plaintiff has failed to file timely objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the August 15, 2019, Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 46) is approved and adopted as the Opinion of the Court. Defendant Crommell’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will enter. Dated: September 23, 2019 /s/ Gordon J. Quist GORDON J. QUIST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?