Jamerson #138940 v. Crommell et al
Filing
51
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 46 re 41 : Defendant Crommell's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; case closed; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
DAVID L. JAMERSON # 138940,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:16-CV-229
v.
HON. GORDON J. QUIST
JEFF CROMMELL, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On August 14, 2019, Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat issued a Report and
Recommendation (R & R) recommending that the Court grant Defendant Crommell’s motion for
summary judgment (ECF No. 41). As noted in the R & R, Plaintiff did not respond to Defendant
Crommell’s motion and, therefore, failed to present evidence opposing it. On September 4, 2019,
this Court entered an Order denying Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file objections to
the R & R because the Court concluded that the time for Plaintiff to gather evidence in response to
Defendant Crommell’s motion had long passed. (ECF No. 50.)
The R & R was duly served on Plaintiff on August 15, 2019, and Plaintiff has failed to file
timely objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the August 15, 2019, Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 46) is approved and adopted as the Opinion of the Court. Defendant
Crommell’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s complaint
is dismissed with prejudice.
A separate judgment will enter.
Dated: September 23, 2019
/s/ Gordon J. Quist
GORDON J. QUIST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?