Jackson #748757 v. Feliciano, et al

Filing 77

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 69 re 62 , 60 : Defendants' Motion 62 for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Defendants Feliciano and Pokley are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Plaintiff's Motion 60 for Injunctive Relief and Motion 74 extending time to file are DENIED; case closed; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION

DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON #748757,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:17-CV-77

v.
HON. GORDON J. QUIST
JODI FELICIANO, et al.,
Defendants.
/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On December 11, 2018, Magistrate Judge Greeley issued a Report and Recommendation
recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 62) and
dismiss Defendants Feliciano and Pokley without prejudice and deny Plaintiff’s motion for
injunctive relief (ECF No. 60). On January 2, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for
enlargement of time and allowed Plaintiff until January 30, 2019, to file an objection. (ECF No. 73.)
Plaintiff failed to file an objection within the allowed time pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Instead,
Plaintiff filed a second motion for enlargement of time, requesting an additional 30 days in which
to file an objection. (ECF No. 74.) Plaintiff ignores the Court’s admonition in its January 2, 2019,
Order that “[n]o further extensions will be granted.” (ECF No. 73.) Moreover, Plaintiff waited until
after the extended time expired to submit his request for additional time. Therefore, the Court will
deny Plaintiff’s motion for more time.
The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, finds no basis to reject it and
will adopt it as the Opinion of the Court.

Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the December 11, 2018, Report and Recommendation
(ECF No. 69) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the
Basis of Exhaustion (ECF No. 62) is GRANTED, and Defendants Feliciano and Pokley are
dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 60)
and Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Enlargement of Time to file Objections (ECF No. 74) are
DENIED.
This case is concluded.
A separate judgment will enter.

Dated: February 13, 2019

/s/ Gordon J. Quist
GORDON J. QUIST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2