Parker #593090 v. Horton et al
Filing
146
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying motion for partial summary judgment 74 in 2:18cv80 and denying motion for summary judgment 53 in 2:18cv186; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney ; this document appears in the following associated cases: 2:18-cv-00080-PLM-MV, 2:18-cv-00186-PLM-MV (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
BRUCE PARKER,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:18-cv-80
v.
HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY
CONNIE HORTON, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
BRUCE PARKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 2:18-cv-186
HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY
KENNETH MCKEE, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Bruce Parker filed two prisoner civil rights actions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
In February 2020, the two actions were consolidated (ECF No. 113 in Case No. 2:18-cv-80; ECF
No. 68 in Case No. 2:18cv186). Plaintiff has filed a motion for partial summary judgment (ECF
No. 74 in Case No. 2:18-cv-80) and a motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 53 in 2:18-cv-186).
The matters were referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on
August 18, 2020, recommending that this Court deny the motions.
The Report and
Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 145 in Case
No. 2:18-cv-80 and ECF No. 100 in Case No. 2:18-cv-186) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the
Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that both the motion for partial summary judgment (ECF
No. 74 in Case No. 2:18-cv-80) and the motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 53 in 2:18-cv186) are DENIED.
Dated: September 16, 2020
/s/ Paul L. Maloney
Paul L. Maloney
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?