Coffey v. Freeport, City of et al

Filing 12

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 ; complaint is DISMISSED; Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (elam)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
ANN COFFEY,
Plaintiff,
File no: 2:22-cv-18
v.
HON. ROBERT J. JONKER
CITY OF FREEPORT, et al.,
Defendants.
/

ORDER APPROVING MAGISTRATE'S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States
Magistrate Judge in this action on December 5, 2023 (ECF No. 6). The Report and
Recommendation was duly served on the parties.

No objections have been filed under 28

U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C).1
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 6) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED under 28
U.S.C. § 1915€(2)(B) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent Plaintiff seeks to assert state law claims,
the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is TERMINATED.

1 The Plaintiff moved twice for an extension of time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF
Nos. 7, 9). The motions were granted (ECF Nos. 8, 10). The Order granting the second extension was mailed to
Plaintiff at the address she confirmed in her first motion for extension (ECF No. 7). The Order was returned to the
Court with the notation “Return to Sender. Not Deliverable as Addressed. Unable to Forward.”

The Court discerns no good-faith basis for appeal of this matter.

See McGore v.

Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3).

Dated: March 27, 2024

/s/ Robert J. Jonker
ROBERT J. JONKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE