Coffey v. Freeport, City of et al

Filing 12

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 ; complaint is DISMISSED; Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (elam)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION ANN COFFEY, Plaintiff, File no: 2:22-cv-18 v. HON. ROBERT J. JONKER CITY OF FREEPORT, et al., Defendants. / ORDER APPROVING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action on December 5, 2023 (ECF No. 6). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C).1 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 6) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915€(2)(B) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent Plaintiff seeks to assert state law claims, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is TERMINATED. 1 The Plaintiff moved twice for an extension of time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF Nos. 7, 9). The motions were granted (ECF Nos. 8, 10). The Order granting the second extension was mailed to Plaintiff at the address she confirmed in her first motion for extension (ECF No. 7). The Order was returned to the Court with the notation “Return to Sender. Not Deliverable as Addressed. Unable to Forward.” The Court discerns no good-faith basis for appeal of this matter. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3). Dated: March 27, 2024 /s/ Robert J. Jonker ROBERT J. JONKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?