Jackson v. Dingle
ORDER denying 71 Motion for Certificate of Appealability (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 10/16/2012. (PJM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Civil No. 02-1803(DSD)
Tony DeJuan Jackson,
Lynn Dingle, Warden,
This matter is before the court upon petitioner Tony DeJuan
Jackson’s pro se application for a certificate of appealability
Petitioner seeks to appeal the court’s denial of Rule
60(b)(6) relief in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 case originally filed on
September 25, 2001.
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
For such a showing, “[t]he petitioner must
demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s
assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack
v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
Petitioner failed to meet
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s
application for a certificate of appealability [ECF No. 71] is
October 16, 2012
s/David S. Doty
David S. Doty, Judge
United States District Court
The court denied a certificate of appealability in its
initial order. See ECF No. 68.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?