E*Trade Securities, et al v. Deutsche Bank, AG, et al
Filing
849
ORDER granting 844 Motion to Reopen Case. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 02/21/06. (rhks) Modified on 2/22/2006 (LPH).
E*Trade Securities, et al v. Deutsche Bank, AG, et al
Doc. 849
Case 0:02-cv-03711-MJD-AJB
Document 849
Filed 02/21/2006
Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Deutsche Bank Securities Ltd., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 02-3682 (RHK/AJB) ORDER
E*TRADE Securities LLC, Plaintiff, Civil No. 02-3711 (RHK/AJB) ORDER v. Deutsche Bank AG, et al., Defendants.
James P. Stephenson, Plaintiff, Civil No. 02-4845 (RHK/AJB) ORDER v. Deutsche Bank AG, et al., Defendants.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 0:02-cv-03711-MJD-AJB
Document 849
Filed 02/21/2006
Page 2 of 3
Wedbush Morgan Securities, Inc., Plaintiff, Civil No. 03-5198 (RHK/AJB) ORDER v. Deutsche Bank AG, et al., Defendants.
E*TRADE Securities, LLC as assignee of Fiserv Securities, Inc., Plaintiff, Civil No. 03-5311 (RHK/AJB) ORDER v. Nomura Canada, Inc., et al., Defendants.
CIBC World Markets, Inc., Plaintiff, Civil No. 04-1469 (RHK/AJB) ORDER v. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., et al., Defendants.
Case 0:02-cv-03711-MJD-AJB
Document 849
Filed 02/21/2006
Page 3 of 3
Plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases have made motions to reopen those cases. Each of those motions (Civ. No. 04-1469, Doc. No. 386; Civ. No. 03-5311, Doc. No. 463; Civ. No. 03-5198, Doc. No. 301; Civ. No. 02-4845, Doc. No. 591; Civ. No. 02-3711, Doc. No. 844; Civ. No. 02-3682, Doc. No. 944) is GRANTED as follows: 1. The above-captioned cases are REOPENED and shall remain open until May 22, 2006; and 2. Plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases have leave to seek additional time beyond May 22, 2006, if necessary.
Dated: February 21, 2006
s/Richard H. Kyle RICHARD H. KYLE United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?