Virgin Records America, Inc v. Thomas

Filing 63

Virgin Records America, Inc v. Thomas

Doc. 63

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA DULUTH DIVISION VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., a Califor nia corporation; CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership; ARISTA RECORDS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; INTERSCOPE RECORDS, a California general partnership; WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., a Delaware corporation; and UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaint iffs, vs. Jammie Thomas, Defendant.

Case No.: 06cv1497-MJD/RLE PLAINTIFFS'PROPOSED VERDICT FORM

Pursuant to the Court' Order of August 3, 2007, Plaintiffs respectfully submit the s attached proposed verdict form.

Dockets.Justia.com

Respectfully submitted this 17th day of September 2007. s/ Laura G. Coates Felicia J. Boyd (No. 186168) Laura G. Coates (No. 350175) FAEGRE & BENSON LLP 2200 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-3901 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Richard L. Gabriel (pro hac vice) Timothy M. Reynolds (pro hac vice) David A. Tonini (pro hac vice) Andrew B. Mohraz (pro hac vice) HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 1700 Lincoln, Suite 4100 Denver, Colorado 80203 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
fb.u s.2 298175.01

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA DULUTH DIVISION VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., a Califor nia corporation; CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership; ARISTA RECORDS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; INTERSCOPE RECORDS, a California general partnership; WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., a Delaware corporation; and UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaint iffs, vs. Jammie Thomas, Defendant. We the jury, upon our oath, give the following answers to the Court's questions, based upon a preponderance of the evidence: A. Plaintiffs' claim for copyright infringement: 1. On Plaintiffs' claim for copyright infringement, we find for the:

Case No.: 06cv1497-MJD/RLE VERDICT

Answer (Plaintiffs or Defendant): ___________________________ 2. If your answer to question 1 is " laint iffs,"do you find that Defendant' P s

infringement was committed willfully? Answer (Yes or No): ___________________________

3.

If your answer to question 1 is "Plaintiffs," what statutory damages do you award

Plaint iffs for each copyrighted work? a) Answer if non-willful, then $750-$30,000? _______________________ b) Answer if willful, then up to $150,000? 4. Please calculate the total amount of damages: Damages per infringement (from question 3 above): $___________________ x 26 Sound Recordings _______________________

Total = $____________________

Dated:___________________________

____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________

_____________________________ Foreperson _____________________________ _____________________________