Virgin Records America, Inc v. Thomas

Filing 69

Virgin Records America, Inc v. Thomas

Doc. 69

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation; CAPITOL RECORDS INC., a Delaware corporation; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership; ARISTA RECORDS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; INTERSCOPE RECORDS, a California general partnership; WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., a Delaware corporation; and UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Jammie Thomas, Defendant. Attached hereto are Defendant Jammie Thomas' Proposed UnAgreedUpon Jury Instructions indexed as follows: Pg. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Title Action for Copyright Infringement 2.08A Evidence Admitted Against Only One Party 3.04 Burden Of Proof Proof of Plaintiff: Owner of Works Protected by Copyright Act Each Plaintiff Claims in Each Case That the Defendant Violated its Exclusive Rights to Reproduce and Distribute its Copyrighted Works § 160.90 Generally- Virgin Records had a Valid Copyright § 160.90 Generally- Capitol Records Inc. had a Valid Copyright § 160.90 Generally- Sony BMG Music Entertainment had a Valid Copyright § 160.90 Generally- Arista Records LLC had a Valid Copyright § 160.90 Generally- Interscope Records had a Valid Copyright Case No. 06-cv-1497 (MJD/RLE)

DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED UNAGREED-UPON JURY INSTRUCTIONS

Dockets.Justia.com

11 12 13

§ 160.90 Generally- Warner Bros. Records Inc. had a Valid Copyright § 160.90 Generally- UMG Recordings Inc. had a Valid Copyright § 160.93 Statutory Damages CHESTNUT & CAMBRONNE, P.A. By s/Brian N. Toder Brian N. Toder #17869X 3700 Campbell Mithun Tower 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 [phone] Fax [phone] ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Dated: September 17, 2007

2