Hammond v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filing
134
ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on March 31, 2010. (HAM)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA _______________________________________________________________________ PATRICK JOHN HAMMOND AND DEBRA HAMMOND, Plaintiffs, v. RITTAL CORPORATION AND ORTAL DIECASTING, LTD., Defendants. _______________________________________________________________________ Paul Peterson, William Harper and Lori Barton, HARPER & PETERSON, PLLC, 3040 Woodbury Drive, Woodbury, MN 55129, for Plaintiffs. Brian Wood and Patrick Larkin, LIND, JENSEN, SULLIVAN & PETERSON, PA, 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1700, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Defendant Rittal Corporation. William Celebrezze, AAFEDT, FORDE, GRAY, MONSON & HAGER, PA, 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2600, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Defendant Ortal Diecasting, Ltd. The Court having been advised that the above action has settled, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice, the Court retaining jurisdiction for forty-five days to permit any party to move or reopen the action, for good cause shown, or to submit and file a stipulated form of final judgment, or to seek enforcement of the settlement terms. Civil No. 06-1670 (JRT/FLN)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
DATED: March 31, 2010 at Minneapolis, Minnesota.
s/ John R. Tunheim JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
