Roth v. Larson et al

Filing 10

ORDER denying 6 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Jim Adam Roth, (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 01/28/2007. (SMS)

Download PDF
Roth v. Larson et al Doc. 10 Case 0:06-cv-04574-MJD-JSM Document 10 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jim Adam Roth, Plaintiff, v. ORDER Civil No. 06-4574 (MJD/JSM) Nanette M. Larson, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________________________________ Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the Order of Magistrate Judge Mayeron dated December 7, 2006 denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff also requests that Magistrate Judge Mayeron be removed from this case, arguing she is biased and unreasonable. The Court will treat Plaintiff's motion as objections to the Order dated December 7, 2006. The Court must modify or set aside any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); Local Rule 72.1(b)(2). Based on a review of the record and the submissions of the parties, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Order is neither clearly erroneous or contrary to law. In addition, the Court finds that Plaintiff has not presented the Court any basis to support his assertions that Magistrate Judge Mayeron was unreasonable or showed bias in denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Dockets.Justia.com Case 0:06-cv-04574-MJD-JSM Document 10 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 2 of 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration and to Remove Magistrate Judge Mayeron [Doc. No. 6] is DENIED. Date: January 28, 2007 s / Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis United States District Court Civil No. 06-4574

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?