Hysitron Incorporated v. MTS Systems Corporation

Filing 127

DECLARATION of Joshua Graham in Opposition to 117 Second MOTION to Stay Pending Patent Reexamination filed by Hysitron Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A - F, # 2 Exhibit(s) G - H)(Hinderaker, Allen)

Download PDF
Hysitron Incorporated v. MTS Systems Corporation Doc. 127 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) HYSITRON INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation, Plaintiff, v. MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07 CV 1533 ADM/AJB DECLARATION OF JOSHUA GRAHAM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S RENEWED MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING REEXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF'S PATENTS I, Joshua Graham, hereby declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney with the law firm of Merchant & Gould located in Minneapolis, Minnesota and represent Plaintiff Hysitron Incorporated ("Hysitron") in the above-captioned action. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of "Defendant's Prior Art Statement," excluding Appendix A thereto, dated September 17, 2007. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the "Information Disclosure Statement by Applicant," which was submitted during the Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 5,553,486 and indicates that the Examiner considered each reference listed therein. Dockets.Justia.com 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the internet cite located at http://www.mtsnano.com/news, as it appeared on July 21, 2008. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of a letter from Agilent Technologies to Allen Hinderaker, dated June 30, 2008. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of Ecolab, Inc. v. FMC Corp., 05-CV-831, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39189 (D. Minn. May 29, 2007). 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of the "Comments on Statement of Reasons for Patentability and/or Confirmation," submitted on May 23, 2008, during the Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 5,553,486. 8. brochure. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of an e-mail from Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of a Nano Vision David Pearson to Allen Hinderaker, dated July 21, 2008. I state under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct. Dated: June 24, 2008 /s/Joshua P. Graham Joshua P. Graham 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?