Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The

Filing 102

MEMORANDUM in Support re 100 MOTION for Leave to File A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Timebase Pty Ltd. (Hosteny, Joseph)

Download PDF
Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The Doc. 102 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA LEMOND CYCLING INC., Plaintiff, v. TREK BICYCLE CORPORATION, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GREG LEMOND, Third-Party Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 08-CV-1010 (RHK/JSM) CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE The undersigned certifies that Trek's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Protective Order has been prepared in compliance with the length limitations of Local Rule 7.1(c) and the type-size limitations of Local Rule 7.1(e). In particular, the text in this memorandum contains 3,055 words (as calculated by the word count feature of the word processing program, applied specifically to include all headings, footnotes, and quotations) and has been prepared in Times New Roman 13-point font, using Microsoft Word 2002, Version SP-3. ND: 4826-0282-4707 Dockets.Justia.com Dated this 30th day of April, 2009 HALLELAND LEWIS NILAN & JOHNSON, P.A. By: s/Benjamin J. Rolf Erik T. Salveson (Reg. No. 177969) Amanda M. Cialkowski (Reg. No. 306514) Benjamin J. Rolf (Reg. No. 386413) 600 U.S. Bank Plaza South 220 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone (612) 338-1838 Fax: (612) 338-7858 and Ralph A. Weber (State Bar No. 1001563) Christopher P. Dombrowicki (State Bar No. 1041764) Kristal S. Stippich (State Bar No. 1061028) GASS WEBER MULLINS, LLC 309 North Water Street, Suite 700 Milwa ukee, WI 53202 Telephone: (414) 223-3300 Fax: (414) 224-6116 Email: weber@gasswebermullins.com dombrowicki@gasswebermullins.com stippich@gasswebermullins.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF TREK BICYCLE CORPORATION 2 ND: 4826-0282-4707

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?