Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The

Filing 139

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF filed by Thomson Corporation, The, West Publishing Corporation, West Services. (Attachments: # 1 LR7.1 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Razavi, Katherine)

Download PDF
Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The Doc. 139 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA PLACEHOLDER FOR EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF EMILY S. ZASTROW (45, 55-57, 61, 66, 70, 74 **FILED UNDER SEAL** LeMond Cycling, Inc., Plaint iff, v. Trek Bicycle Corporation, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Greg Lemond, Third-Party Defendant. This document is a place holder for the following item(s) which are filed in conventional or physical form with the Clerk's Office: Exhibits to Declaration of Emily S. Zastrow (45, 55-57, 61, 66, 70, 74) If you are a participant in this case, this filing will be served upon you in conventional format. This filing was not e-filed for the following reason(s): ___ Voluminous Document* (Document number of order granting leave to file conventionally: ___ ) ___ Unable to Scan Documents (e.g., PDF file size of one page larger than 2MB, illegible when scanned) ___ Physical Object (description): ___ Non Graphical/Textual Computer File (audio, video, etc.) on CD or other media _X_ Item Under Seal pursuant to a court order* (Document number of protective order: 99 ) ___ Item Under Seal pursuant to the Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1 (Document number of redacted version: ___ ) Civil Number: 08-1010 (RHK/JSM) ___ Other (description): * Filing of these items requires Judicial Approval. E-file this place holder in ECF in place of the documents filed conventionally. File a copy of this Placeholder and a copy of the NEF with the Clerk's Office along with the conventionally filed item(s). forms\cmecf\convfilingplchldr.doc Form Updated 07/29/05 ND: 4817-6177-4596 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?