Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The

Filing 183

LR7.1 WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE by Timebase Pty Ltd re 178 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Timebase Pty Ltd. (Hosteny, Joseph)

Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The

Doc. 183

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. 07CV1687 (JNE/JJG) TIMEBASE'S LOCAL RULE 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

TIMEBASE PTY LTD., Plaintiff, vs. THE THOMSON CORPORATION, WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, AND WEST SERVICES, INC., Defendants.

I, Joseph N. Hosteny, certify that TimeBase's Memorandum in Support of Its Motion To Compel Adequate Discovery Regarding Damages complies with Local Rule 7.1(d). I further certify that, in preparation of this response, Microsoft Word 2003 was used, and that this word processing program has been applied specifically to include all text, including headings, footnotes, and quotations in the following word count. I further certify that TimeBase's Memorandum in Support of Its Motion Regarding the Protective Order (Filed Under Seal) complies with Local Rule 7.1(c) contains 5,038 words, excluding the caption and the signature block. Dated: October 5, 2010 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Joseph N. Hosteny Joseph N. Hosteny Arthur A. Gasey Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro 181 West Madison, Suite 4600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Telephone: [phone]

Dockets.Justia.com

Michael R. Cunningham Gray, Plant & Mooty 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for TimeBase Pty Ltd.

2