Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The

Filing 225

AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 5/20/2011. Motions (non-disp) due 5/20/2011. Motions (disp) due by 6/1/2011. Ready for trial due by 8/16/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham on 2/1/11. (RLR)

Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The

Doc. 225

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Timebase Pty Ltd., Civil No. 07-1687 (JNE/JJG) Plaintiff, vs. The Thomson Corporation, West Publishing Corporation and West Services, Inc., Defendants. ORDER MODIFYING THIRD AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

After review of the positions of the parties (Doc. Nos. 223, 224) and in consideration of the Court's desire to be efficient, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Pretrial Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 71), as amended (Doc. No. 104, 111, and 166) is AMENDED as follows: 1. On or before February 28, 2011, the parties shall exchange initial expert reports, which reports shall be in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) ("Initial Expert Reports"). The Initial Expert Reports from each party shall deal with the issues on which that party has the burden of persuasion; On or before April 1, 2011, Rebuttal Expert Reports shall be exchanged. Rebuttal Expert Reports shall also be in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B); All expert discovery shall be completed by May 20, 2011; All non-dispositive motions relating to the expert discovery shall be served and filed on or before May 20, 2011; All dispositive motions shall be filed, served and scheduled in compliance with the Electronic Case Filing Procedures for the District of Minnesota and Local Rule 7.1. Dispositive motions shall

2.

3. 4. 5.

Dockets.Justia.com

be scheduled for a hearing by calling Sheri Frette, Calendar Clerk for the Honorable Joan N. Ericksen at [phone]. Counsel are reminded that they must anticipate the time required for obtaining hearing dates. All dispositive motions shall be filed and served on or before June 1, 2011; and 6. This case shall be ready for a jury trial on August 16, 2011. The anticipated length of trial is ten (10) days. The District Judge will call the case for trial when its' calendar so allows.

All other dates contained in the Pretrial Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 71), as amended (Doc. No. 104, 111, and 166) remain unchanged.

Dated: February 1, 2011

s/ Jeanne J. Graham JEANNE J. GRAHAM United States Magistrate Judge

2