Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The

Filing 235

DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR-MOTION to Exclude Expert Testimony of Dr. Ophir Frieder by Thomson Corporation, The, West Publishing Corporation, West Services. (Litsey, Calvin) Modified text on 7/1/2011 (jz).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA TIMEBASE PTY LTD., Civil No. 07-1687 (JNE/JJG) Plaintiff, vs. THE THOMSON CORPORATION, WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, and WEST SERVICES, INC., DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. OPHIR FRIEDER Defendants. Defendants The Thomson Corporation, West Publishing Corporation, and West Services, Inc. (collectively, “ Defendants” hereby move the Court pursuant to Federal ) Rule of Evidence 702 for an order excluding the opinion and testimony of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Plaintiff’ technical expert, on direct or indirect infringement of United States s Patent Nos. 6,233,592 and 7,293,228, or, in the alternative, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) and 37(c) for an order precluding Dr. Ophir Frieder from testifying that Defendants’ accused products or methods embody any limitation of any asserted patent claim. Defendants’ motion is based upon the Notice of Motion and Motion, the Brief in Support of Defendants’ Motion, and on the file, declarations, exhibits, record, and proceedings herein. Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 30, 2011 fb.us.6990929.01 s/Calvin L. Litsey David J.F. Gross (# 208772) Calvin L. Litsey (# 153746) Mary V. Sooter (pro hac vice) Kevin P. Wagner (# 34008X) Katherine S. Razavi (#388958) Faegre & Benson LLP 2200 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 DGross@faegre.com; CLitsey@faegre.com; MSooter@faegre.com; KWagner@faegre.com; KRazavi@faegre.com Attorneys for Defendants The Thomson Corporation, West Publishing Corporation, and West Services, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?