Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The
Filing
257
LR7.1 WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE by Timebase Pty Ltd re 255 Response,. (Hosteny, Joseph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
TIMEBASE PTY LTD.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
THE THOMSON CORPORATION, WEST
PUBLISHING CORPORATION, AND WEST
SERVICES, INC.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
File No. 07‐CV‐1687 (JNE/JJG)
TIMEBASE’S LOCAL RULE 7.1
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I, Joseph N. Hosteny, certify that TimeBase's Response to Defendants' Motion
to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Ophir Frieder complies with Local Rule 7.1(c) and (e).
I further certify that, in preparation of this response, I used Microsoft Word
2003, and that this word processing program has been applied specifically to
include all text, including headings, footnotes, and quotations in the following word
count.
I further certify that TimeBase's Response to Defendants' Motion to Exclude
Testimony of Dr. Ophir Frieder complies with Local Rule 7.1(c) and (e) contains
3,339 words, excluding caption and signature block.
Dated: July 21, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Joseph N. Hosteny
Joseph N. Hosteny
Arthur A. Gasey
Niro, Haller & Niro
181 West Madison, Suite 4600
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Telephone: (312) 236‐0733
Michael R. Cunningham
Gray, Plant & Mooty
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: (612) 632‐3000
Fax: (612) 632‐4444
Attorneys for TimeBase Pty Ltd.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?