Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The

Filing 276

LR7.1 WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE by Timebase Pty Ltd re 275 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Timebase Pty Ltd. (Hosteny, Joseph)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

TIMEBASE PTY LTD.,
vs.

Plaintiff,

THE THOMSON CORPORATION, WEST
PUBLISHING CORPORATION, and WEST
SERVICES, INC.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

File No. 07-CV-1687 (JNE/JJG)
TIMEBASE’S LOCAL RULE 7.1
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I, Joseph N. Hosteny, certify that TimeBase's Memorandum in Support of Its

Motion to Clarify The Claim Construction As It Relates to Summary Judgment
complies with Local Rule 7.1(c) and (e).

I further certify that, in preparation of this response, I used Microsoft Word

2003, and that this word processing program has been applied specifically to
include all text, including headings, footnotes, and quotations in the following word
count.

I further certify that TimeBase's Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to

Clarify The Claim Construction complies with Local Rule 7.1(c) and (e) contains
4,072 words, excluding caption and signature block.
Dated: August 18, 2011

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Joseph N. Hosteny
Joseph N. Hosteny
Arthur A. Gasey
Robert A. Conley

Niro, Haller & Niro
181 West Madison, Suite 4600
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Telephone: [phone]

Michael R. Cunningham
Gray, Plant & Mooty
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for TimeBase Pty Ltd.

2