TimeBase Pty Ltd. v. Thomson Corporation, The et al

Filing 29

Declaration of Shawn T. Gordon in Support of 27 APPEAL/OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge re 24 Order on Motion to Consolidate Cases filed by Thomson Corporation, The. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 1, # 2 Exhibit(s) 2, # 3 Exhibit(s) 3, # 4 Exhibit(s) 4)(Gordon, Shawn)

Download PDF
TimeBase Pty Ltd. v. Thomson Corporation, The et al Doc. 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA TIMEBASE PTY LTD., Plaintiff, vs. THE THOMSON CORPORATION, WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, and WEST SERVICES, INC., Defendants. DECLARATION OF SHAWN T. GORDON IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS'APPEAL OF AND OBJECTIONS TO ORDERS DENYING A STAY OF THE ` 28 2 CASE (NO. 07-4551) AND LIFTING THE STAY OF THE ` 92 CASE (NO. 5 07-1687) Civil No. 07-CV-4551 (JNE/JJG) Civil No. 07-CV-1687 (JNE/JJG) I, Shawn T. Gordon, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney at Faegre & Benson LLP in Minneapolis, Minnesota. I am one of the lawyers representing The Thomson Corporation, West Publishing Corporation, and West Services, Inc. in connection with the above action. This declaration is made on my personal knowledge and belief. 2. documents: EXHIBIT NO. 1: EXHIBIT NO. 2: EXHIBIT NO. 3: February 12, 2008 Order in Case No. 07-4551 (Docket No. 24) February 12, 2008 Order in Case No. 07-1687 (Docket No. 51) Transcript from June 28, 2007 Hearing on Motion to Stay Case No. 07-1687 Pending Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,233,592 I have attached to this declaration true and correct copies of the following Dockets.Justia.com EXHIBIT NO. 4: Transcript from January 24, 2008 Hearing on Motion to Consolidate with Case No. 07-4551 and Stay Pending Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,233,592 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed this 26th day of February 2008 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. s/ Shawn T. Gordon Shawn T. Gordon fb.us.2645755.01

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?