Minnesota, State of v. CMI of Kentucky, Inc.

Filing 162

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Christopher D. Jacobsen, Robert J. Bergstrom, Craig A. Zenobian, Shane M. Steffensen re 158 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 160 Declaration in Opposition, 159 Declaration in Opposition, 161 LR7.1 Word Count Compliance Certificate, (Ramsay, Charles)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA _________________________________ State of Minnesota, by Michael Campion, its Commissioner of Public Safety, Court File No. 0:08-cv-00603-DWF-AJB Plaintiff, v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CMI of Kentucky, Inc., A Kentucky Corporation, Defendant, and Robert J. Bergstrom, Craig A. Zenobian, Shane M. Steffensen and Christopher D. Jacobsen, Plaintiffs-Intervenor. _________________________________ I hereby certify that on May 15, 2009 I caused the following documents: Plaintiffs-Intervenor's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or Summary Judgment and in Support of the State's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Specific Performance, and Injunction Local Rule 7.1(c) Word Count Certificate Second Declaration of Thomas Workman Declaration of John J. Gores with Exhibits 1-18 to be filed electronically with the Clerk of Court through ECF, and that ECF will send an e-notice of the electronic filing to the following: David M Aafedt daafedt@winthrop.com,charrigan@winthrop.com 1 Emerald A Gratz emerald.gratz@state.mn.us Jeffrey F. Lebowski Jeffrey.lebowski@state.mn.us Jessica Slattery Karich jkarich@winthrop.com, gnettleton@winthrop.com William A McNab wmcnab@winthrop.com, kcolon@winthrop.com Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice mhalberg@halbergdefense.com Marsh J. Halberg mhalberg@halbergdefense.com, tanderson@halbergdefense.com GORES LAW OFFICE Dated: May 15, 2009 /s/ John J. Gores John J. Gores ID No. 228928 7091 Highway 65 NE, Suite 201 Fridley, Minnesota 55432 763-571-4777 Attorney for Plaintiffs- Intervenor 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?