Minnesota, State of v. CMI of Kentucky, Inc.

Filing 42

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Christopher D. Jacobsen, Robert J. Bergstrom, Craig A. Zenobian, Shane M. Steffensen re 41 LR7.1 Word Count Compliance Certificate, (Ramsay, Charles)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA _________________________________ State of Minnesota, by Michael Campion, its Commissioner of Public Safety, Court File No. 0:08-cv-00603-DWF-AJB Plaintiff, v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CMI of Kentucky, Inc., A Kentucky Corporation, Defendant Robert J. Bergstrom, Craig A. Zenobian, Shane M. Steffensen and Christopher D. Jacobsen Applicants _________________________________ I hereby certify that on October 1, 2008 I caused the following documents: FIRST AMENDED LR 7.1(c) WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE REGARDING APPLICANTS' LOCAL RULE 72.02 (A) OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER DENYING APPLICANTS' MOTION FOR INTERVENTION to be filed electronically with the Clerk of Court through ECF, and that ECF will send an e-notice of the electronic filing to the following: · David M Aafedt daafedt@winthrop.com,charrigan@winthrop.com Emerald A Gratz emerald.gratz@state.mn.us Jessica Slattery Karich jkarich@winthrop.com,gnettleton@winthrop.com · · · Peter D Magnuson peter.magnuson@state.mn.us William A McNab wmcnab@winthrop.com,kcolon@winthrop.com · RAMSAY & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. Dated: October 1, 2008 /s/ Daniel J. Koewler Daniel J. Koewler ID No. 388460 2780 Snelling Avenue North, #330 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 651-604-0000 Attorneys for Applicants RAMSAY & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. Dated: October 1, 2008 /s/ Charles A. Ramsay Charles A. Ramsay ID No. 260277 2780 Snelling Avenue North, #330 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 651-604-0000 Attorneys for Applicants GORES LAW OFFICE Dated: October 1, 2008 s/ John J. Gores John J. Gores ID No. 228928 7091 Highway 65 NE, Suite 201 Fridley, Minnesota 55432 763-571-4777 Attorneys for Applicants

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?