Boyd v. Astrue

Filing 31

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 27 . 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 17 is DENIED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 22 is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 6/1/09. (GRR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ANTHONY MARVIN BOYD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.

ORDER Civil No. 08785 (MJD/FLN)

Fay E. Fishman, Peterson & Fishman, Counsel for Plaintiff. Lonnie F. Bryan, United States Attorney's Office, Counsel for Defendant. This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation

of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel [Docket No. 27]. Plaintiff Anthony Marvin Boyd filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 28]. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that: 1

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 17] is DENIED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 22] is GRANTED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Date: June 1, 2009 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court

2