Tubbs v. Wells Fargo Bank

Filing 41

ORDER : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Plaintiffs motion for remand [Docket No. 27] is DENIED.2.Defendants motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 17] is GRANTED.3.Plaintiffs Complaint [Docket No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on November 17,2009. (slf)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Estate of Jeffrey Deane Tubbs, Plaintiff, v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Defendant. Jerome S. Rice, Esq., Jerome S. Rice & Associates, A Professional Association, appeared for Plaintiff Estate of Jeffrey Deane Tubbs. Melissa Raphan, Esq., Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, appeared for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. On November 17, 2009, the Court filed under seal a Memorandum. Unless the Court otherwise orders, it will either unseal or file a redacted version of the Memorandum on December 8, 2009. The parties shall submit proposed redactions, if any, to the Memorandum by December 1, 2009. Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. 2. 3. Plaintiff's motion for remand [Docket No. 27] is DENIED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 17] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint [Docket No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Civil No. 08-4944 (JNE/JSM) ORDER

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: November 17, 2009 s/ Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge