Raymer v. Cruz

Filing 22

ORDER. 1. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 29, 2009 18 . 2. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED. 3. Petitioner's Motion for a Supplemental Reply 17 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/2/09. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ________________________________________________________________ LARRY P. RAYMER, Petitioner, v. ORDER Civil File No. 085198 (MJD/JJG) M. CRUZ, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________ Larry P. Raymer, pro se. Chad A. Blumenfield and Gregory G. Brooker, United States Attorney's Office, Counsel for Respondent. ________________________________________________________________ The aboveentitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham dated May 29, 2009 [Docket No. 18]. Petitioner Larry P. Raymer has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the 1 record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham dated May 29, 2009. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 29, 2009 [Docket No. 18]. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Docket No. 1] is DENIED. Petitioner's Motion for a Supplemental Reply [Docket No. 17] is DENIED AS MOOT. 2. 3. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: July 2, 2009 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?