Walker v. D.O.C. et al

Filing 7

Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation 6 , and further ordering: 1. Plaintiff's claims against D.O.C., D.H.H.S., MCF-Shakopee, Warden Mickey Kopfman, Dr. Straumer, Dr. Mandac, Rick Hillengaas (Warden), Nurse Kathy, D.O.C. Lt. Kopet, Rick Padfield, Lt. Cassidy, Sgt. Foster, C/O Parr, C/O Perlich, C/O McCoy, C/O Lindahl, Glen Anderson, Michelle Fullmer, and Kathy Burton are Dismissed With Prejudice; and 2. Plaintiff's claims against the remaining Defendants shall be allowed to proceed at this time, without prejudice to any defenses that those Defendants may later seek to raise. (Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 11/10/2008. (LM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Ronena Shantel Walker, Plaintiff, v. D.O.C., et al., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated October 1, 2008. The R&R recommended that this Court dismiss Plaintiff's claims against some Defendants and allow her claims to proceed as to other Defendants. Neither party has filed an objection to the R&R in the time period permitted. The Court therefore ADOPTS the R&R (Docket No. 6). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's claims against D.O.C., D.H.H.S., MCF-Shakopee, Warden Mickey Kopfman, Dr. Straumer, Dr. Mandac, Rick Hillengaas (Warden), Nurse Kathy, DOC Lt. Kopet, Rick Padfield, Lt. Cassidy, Sgt. Foster, C/O Parr, C/O Perlich, C/O McCoy, C/O Lindahl, Lt. Cassidy, Glen Anderson, Michelle Fullmer, and Kathy Burton are DISMISSED with prejudice; and ORDER Civil No. 08-5208 (PAM/FLN) 2. Plaintiff's claims against the remaining Defendants shall be allowed to proceed at this time, without prejudice to any defenses that those Defendants may later seek to raise. Dated: Monday, November 10, 2008 s/ Paul A. Magnuson Paul A. Magnuson United States District Court Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?