Nordin v. Astrue et al

Filing 30

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 16, 2009 26 . 2. That Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 19 is DENIED. 3. That Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 22 is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/12/10. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA WYATT NORDIN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendants. ORDER Civil File No. 085295 (MJD/AJB) Lionel H. Peabody, Counsel for Plaintiff. Lonnie F. Bryan, United States Attorney's Office, Counsel for Defendant. This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated October 16, 2009 [Docket No. 26]. Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 28]. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 1. 2. 3. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 16, 2009 [Docket No. 26]. That Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 19] is DENIED. That Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 22] is GRANTED Date: January 12, 2010 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?