Boles et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al

Filing 54

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' LEAD COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 7/6/11. (ds)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA IN RE MEDTRONIC, INC. SPRINT FIDELIS LEADS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This documents relates to: Boles, et al. v. Medtronic, Inc. et al. 08-cv-06001 MDL NO. 08-1905 (RHK/JSM) AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ LEAD COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel previously filed a Motion to Withdraw in this action, seeking the withdrawal of retained counsel for Plaintiffs Marcus Keeton and Charles Poe. The Court granted that Motion and ordered that Williams Kherkher Hart Boundas was no longer counsel of record for Plaintiffs in this action. (See Doc. No. 42.) The Court has subsequently discovered that Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel’s Motion did not list all of the co-counsel identified for Plaintiffs in the docket. As a result, the Court’s Order did not expressly discharge Williams Kherkher Hart Boundas’ co-counsel, as was intended by Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel’s Motion and by the Court. Based on the foregoing, and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s May 19, 2011 Order (Doc. No. 42) is AMENDED to clarify that all counsel of record are discharged from representing Plaintiffs Marcus Keeton and Charles Poe in this action. Dated: July 6, 2011 s/ Richard H. Kyle RICHARD H. KYLE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?