Allen v. Jussila et al

Filing 100

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1.Defendant Karen Jussilas Motion to Dismiss, Alternatively for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 21] be GRANTED; and2.Plaintiffs Complaint with regard to Defendant Karen Jussila be DISMI SSED WITH PREJUDICE; and3.Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment Against Judy Ellerbusch for Failure to File an Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint and, for Entry of Default [Docket No. 75] be DENIED.4.Defendant Judy Ellerbusch be DISMISSED from the suit WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on March 2, 2010. (slf)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA LUCIUS R. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. KAREN JUSSILA, et al., Defendants. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated February 12, 2010. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Karen Jussila's Motion to Dismiss, Alternatively for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 21] be GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff's Complaint with regard to Defendant Karen Jussila be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Against Judy Ellerbusch for Failure to File an Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint and, for Entry of Default [Docket No. 75] be DENIED. ORDER 08CV6366 (JNE/JSM) 4. Defendant Judy Ellerbusch be DISMISSED from the suit WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dated: March 2, 2010. s/Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?