Almer v. Peanut Corporation of America

Filing 1701

A l m e r v. Peanut Corporation of America
OAO450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

D o c . 1701

U N I TE D STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Minnesota
I n re: G u i d a n t Corp Implantable D e f i b r i l l a t o r s Pro d u c t s L i a b i li t y Litigation and Marylou Armuth, individually and as R e p r e se n t at iv e of the Estate of Charles Armuth, deceased; J o h n A. Backlund, individually and as Representative of the E s t a t e of Betty Backlund, deceased; Kimberly Bailey; James B a k e r ; M e l i t a Bena, individually and as Representative of the E s t a t e of Lawrence Bena; Jerri Ceccareilli; Orami Coleman; P a t s y C r i s a n , individually and as Rep r e s e n t a t i v e of the Estate o f Robert Crisan; Donald Dobbs; Eugene Fezi; Charles G a u m e r ; William Hines; Theodore Holl; Mitchell Allen H u s t o n ; Patrick Kelly; William Lauenroth; Teresa H. Lee, i n d i vi d u a l ly and as Representative of the Estate of William L e e ; Billie Lichti; Richard Schmidt; Frank Stewart; and F r a n k Rocha,

J U D G M E N T IN A CIVIL CA S E

V. C a s e Num b e r : G u i d a n t Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac P a c e m a k e r s , Inc., Boston Scientific Corporation, Saint Agnes M e d i c a l Center, Fresno Community Hospital and Medical C e n t e r , and Does 1 through 100 , inclusive

05md1708 and 07-8

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs Marylou Armuth, individually and as Representative of the Estate of Charles Armuth, deceased; Orami Coleman; Patsy Crisan, individually and as Representative of the Estate of Robert Crisan; William Hines; Mitchell Allen Huston; Teresa H. Lee, individually and as Representative of the Estate of William Lee; Billie Lichti; and Richard Schmidt's claims against Defendants Guidant Corporation; Guidant Sales Corporation; Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.; Devices for Vascular Intervention, Inc.; Heart Rhythm Technologies, Inc.; Origin Medsystems, Inc.; Minimally Invasive Systems Group; and Boston Scientific Corporation, expressed in the Complaint (Civil No. 07-08 (DWF/AJB), Doc. No. 1) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. Each party to bear its own costs.

May 1, 2007
Da te (By)

RICHARD D. SLETTEN, CLERK s/DHalfman
DH alfman, Deputy Clerk

Form Modified: 09/16/04

Dockets.Justia.com