Almer v. Peanut Corporation of America

Filing 1830

Almer v. Peanut Corporation of America

Doc. 1830

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: GUIDANT CORP. IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATORS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Irene Kocol, individually and as representative of the estate of Jerald Kocol, deceased, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 07-2009 (DWF/AJB) ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF IRENE KOCOL'S MOTION TO REMAND CASE [28 U.S.C. § 1442 (A)(1)], REQUEST FOR SANCTION [28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c)] MDL No. 05-1708 (DWF/AJB)

Guidant Corporation, an Indiana Corporation; Endovascular Technologies, Inc., a California Corporation and a Division of Guidant Corporation; Guidant Sales Corporation, an Indiana Corporation; and Does One through Sixty, Defendants.

Plaintiff Irene Kocol filed a Motion to Remand Case [28 U.S.C. § 1442 (A)(1)], Request for Sanction [28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c)] on May 21, 2007. (MDL No. 05-1708 (DWF/AJB), Doc. No. 1810; Civ. No. 07-2009 (DWF/AJB), Doc. No. 3.) Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(b), Defendants shall submit their opposition to Kocol's Motion no later than 25 days after they receive this Order. Kocol shall submit her reply, if any, no later

Dockets.Justia.com

than 7 days after she receives Defendants' opposition. Upon receipt of all briefing, the Court will determine whether to schedule oral argument on the matter. Dated: May 22, 2007 s/Donovan W. Frank DONOVAN W. FRANK Judge of United States District Court

2