Almer v. Peanut Corporation of America

Filing 785

Download PDF
Almer v. Peanut Corporation of America Doc. 785 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION In re: Guidant Corp. Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability Litigation This Document Relates to All Actions MDL No. 1708 (DWF/AJB) DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MASTER MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND OR SUPPLEMENT ALL COMPLAINTS TO ADD BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AS DEFENDANT Defendants Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, and Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. submit this unopposed Motion to extend the time within which Defendants may file their response in opposition to Plaintiffs' Master Motion For Leave To Amend Or Supplement All Complaints To Add Boston Scientific Corporation As Defendant, which was filed with this Court on September 15, 2006. After consultation with Plaintiffs' counsel, both parties agree to extend the time within which Defendants may file an opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion until November 3, 2006. Date: October 20, 2006. SHOOK, HARDY & BACON, LLP /s/ Timothy A. Pratt Timothy A. Pratt, Missouri Bar No. 26729 Attorney for Defendants Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP 2555 Grand Blvd. Kansas City, Missouri 64108-2613 Telephone: 816.474.6550 Facsimile 816.421.5547 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS 2142051v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?