Almer v. Peanut Corporation of America

Filing 849

Download PDF
Almer v. Peanut Corporation of America Doc. 849 Att. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA PLACEHOLDER FOR EXHIBIT E TO REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS RELATED TO THE VENTAK PRIZM 2 DR MODEL 1861 BASED ON FEDERAL PREEMPTION IN RE: GUIDANT CORP. IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATORS, PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Case Number: MDL No. 1708 (DWF/AJB) This Document Relates to All Actions This document is a place holder for the following item(s) which are filed in conventional or physical form with the Clerk's Office: Exhibit E: 05/08/00 Reliability Prediction Report VENTAK ICD PRIZM 2 Models 1860/61, Rev. C If you are a participant in this case, this filing will be served upon you in conventional format. This filing was not e-filed for the following reason(s): ___ Voluminous Document* (Document number of order granting leave to file conventionally: ___ ) ___ Unable to Scan Documents (e.g., PDF file size of one page larger than 2MB, illegible when scanned) ___ Physical Object (description): ___ Non Graphical/Textual Computer File (audio, video, etc.) on CD or other media X Item Under Seal pursuant to a court order* (Document number of Protective Order: 11) ___ Item Under Seal pursuant to the Judicial Conference Privacy Policy (General Order 53) (Document number of redacted version: ___ ) forms\cmecf\convfilingplchldr.doc Form Updated 07/29/05 673518v1 Dockets.Justia.com ___ Other (description): * Filing of these items requires Judicial Approval. This Placeholder is e-filed in ECF in place of the documents filed conventionally. A copy of this Placeholder and a copy of the NEF are filed with the Clerk's Office along with the conventionally filed item(s). forms\cmecf\convfilingplchldr.doc Form Updated 07/29/05 673518v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?