Almer v. Peanut Corporation of America

Filing 930

Almer v. Peanut Corporation of America

Doc. 930

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: GUIDANT CORP. IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATORS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Robert F. Bauman, v. Civil No. 06-2183 (DWF/AJB) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO GUIDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF MEDICAL RECORD AUTHORIZATIONS AND PLAINTIFF FACT SHEETS MDL No. 05-1708 (DWF/AJB)

Guidant Corporation and Guidant Sales Corporation, John L. Brennan and Marnie F. Brennan, v. Civil No. 06-2419 (DWF/AJB)

Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., and Boston Scientific Corporation, Tracy Carter, as rightful heir at law and next of kin of Ethel Charlotte Meadows, decedent, v. Civil No. 06-2191 (DWF/AJB)

Guidant Corporation and Guidant Sales Corporation,

Dockets.Justia.com

Shelia Ettinger, v. Civil No. 06-0023 (DWF/AJB)

Guidant Corporation and Guidant Sales Corporation, Roland R. Foreman, v. Civil No. 06-2192 (DWF/AJB)

Guidant Corporation and Guidant Sales Corporation, Betty Ann Martin, as rightful heir at law and next of kin of Frederick William Martin, Sr., decedent, v. Civil No. 06-2193 (DWF/AJB)

Guidant Corporation and Guidant Sales Corporation, Larry Wenig, , Kenneth Noseck, and Jay Ware, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Civil No. 05-2598 (DWF/AJB)

Guidant Corporation and Guidant Sales Corporation, (as to Plaintiffs Noseck and Ware) Guidant filed a Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Authorization and Plaintiff Fact Sheets (MDL 05-1708 (DWF/AJB), Doc. No. 905; Civ. No. 06-2183

2

(DWF/AJB), Doc. No. 3; Civ. No. 06-2419 (DWF/AJB), Doc. No. 3; Civ. No. 06-2191 (DWF/AJB), Doc. No. 3; Civ. No. 06-0023 (DWF/AJB), Doc. No. 3; Civ. No. 06-2192 (DWF/AJB), Doc. No. 3; Civ. No. 06-2193 (DWF/AJB), Doc. No. 3; Civ. No. 05-2598 (DWF/AJB), Doc. No. 10) on November 20, 2006. Guidant did not request oral argument. Absent an agreement among the parties, pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a), individual plaintiffs shall submit their responses to the individual motions no later than fourteen days (14) from the date of this Order. The Court will rule on the motions without oral argument. Dated: November 20, 2006 s/Donovan W. Frank DONOVAN W. FRANK Judge of United States District Court

3