Askew v. Alexandria-Minnesota Sheriff/Police department- District Attorney office et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 3 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 3/20/09. (sf)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA DONALD ASKEW, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDRIA-MINNESOTA SHERIFF/POLICE DEPARTMENTDISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, et al., Defendants. Donald Askew, pro se. This matter is before the Court on what the Court construes to be plaintiff's objection to the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Chief Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson. Judge Erickson recommends dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court has conducted a de novo review of the entire file, including the documents plaintiff filed conventionally in a three-ring binder. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Based on that review, the Court OVERRULES plaintiff's objection [Docket No. 6] and ADOPTS the R&R [Docket No. 3]. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Case No. 09-CV-0389 (PJS/RLE) Dated: March 20, 2009 s/Patrick J. Schiltz Patrick J. Schiltz United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?