Myers v. Anoka County Sheriff et al

Filing 68

ORDER ADOPTING 66 Report and Recommendation, OVERRULING 67 Objections; GRANTING 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; DISMISSING and CLOSING this action. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 07/14/10. (kll)

Download PDF
Myers v. Anoka County Sheriff et al Doc. 68 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Todd Curtis Myers, Plaintiff, v. Anoka County Sheriff, Officer Schroeder, Nursing Staff, and Dr. on Call, Defendants. Civil No. 09-528 (RHK/JJK) ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiff's Objection to the June 4, 2010 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes; Judge Keyes has recommended that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Schroeder be dismissed with prejudice, his claims against "Nurseing [sic] Staff" and "Dr. on Call" be dismissed without prejudice and the action be dismissed. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation of Judge Keyes and Plaintiff's Objections therein. That review satisfies the undersigned that Judge Keyes' recommended disposition is fully supported by the record before him and applicable legal principles. Accordingly, and upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 67) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 66) is ADOPTED; Dockets.Justia.com 3. Defendant Schroder's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 52) is GRANTED; 4. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Schroeder are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 5. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants "Nurseing [sic] Staff" and "Dr. on Call," are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); and 6. This action is DISMISSED and CLOSED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Date: July 14, 2010 s/Richard H. Kyle RICHARD H. KYLE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?